Pick the one that suits how you like to decide.
Same Veloċi, five ways to get to know it. Switch whenever you like.
Reviewer kit · Australia
This page exists to make a thorough review easier, not a kind one. If a proper inspection produces a poor verdict, that is a defect list we did not have to pay for.
What we ask is that the review says how much of the product it saw, because a builder, a checkout, a domain service and a hosting platform are not visible from one page.
What you can test right now
/build/ — pick a trade, answer the interview, edit, change the style and colours, add photos, preview on a phone, and download the finished file. All of that runs without paying.
What it producesThe website downloads as one HTML file and embeds supported images. External media and online services still need a connection.
See the tested export and its limits before relying on offline use.
The commercial journey, up to the tillPackage selection, bundles, tax display and the checkout hand-off are all reachable. The hand-off to the payment page is where the public route ends.
Every public page46 pages in each of 5 markets, plus 780 trade pages and the evidence layer.
What you cannot test
Checkout completion, domain registration, mailbox provisioning, publishing and the customer portal all sit behind a real payment.
There is no reviewer sandbox yet. We would rather say that than let a reviewer quietly guess at a third of the product.
So a review done today can honestly reach a product review with a commercial-journey partial, and should say the paid surfaces were unreachable rather than estimate them. The review manifest sets out the levels and what each requires.
The numbers
6 published measurements at /evidence, each with its sample, method, conditions, spread and — the field that matters most — what the measurement does not establish. Each carries a fingerprint of the build it was taken on: where the product has moved since, the page says revalidation required rather than repeating the number at you.
Two of them read not measured, and stay that way until they are: nobody has run a usability session with a real person, and there are no customer outcomes to report. Those pages exist so that the absence is on the record rather than merely missing.
Corrections
Factual questions and corrections: [email protected]. We will answer a factual question from a reviewer we expect to be critical exactly as fast as one from a reviewer we expect to be kind.
Partner programme
That's the Starter bundle fee. They pay the same, and we never pay for reviews.